I told John Katko, my representative in the US House of Representatives for the 24th district in NYS through the Countable app, that I would (if I could) vote yes to impeach Donald Trump and, although I knew he wouldn’t vote to impeach, I really wanted to know why a person who claims the moral high ground would choose to support “that man” over upholding his oath to protect and defend the US Constitution?
He sent me a letter by email (copy below) but all it contains is the same inauthentic party line answer that every “loyal” Republican party member gives – the evidence does not prove that the President’s actions rise to the level of being impeachable. Apparently we don’t just have different party affiliations, we have different interpretations of the Constitution. He says that he is working to solve many problems in the community and he is present for every vote, but he knows his party members in the Senate are not allowing action on these bills.
It made me sad to realize that I am represented in Congress by a man who thinks so little, and examines his conscience in such a superficial manner that he simply offers up a manufactured excuse to cover up his lack of courage and originality, and his naked ambition. It is difficult to buck the extreme partisan pressures in Congress, pressures that so resemble the peer pressures we have supposedly long outgrown. Or perhaps due to arrogance and hubris Mr. Katko feels absolutely justified in his decision. But I find his moral blindness depressing.
John Katko was tough on crime in my city when we were experiencing lots of gang violence, but when he was done arresting perpetrators and putting them in prison, that area of stubborn poverty and segregation, so extreme that a group called The Century Foundation wrote a paper about it (The Architecture of Segregation), was just as poor and just as segregated as when he began his task force. Neither he, nor anyone on the task force included any programs to work to improve opportunities for the residents, to try to change the cultural loop that had everyone stuck in place. Perhaps not his fault completely, because these were “law and order” days, these were the days when officials felt the need to get tough and felt no duty to change the community for the better beyond getting “bad” guys off the streets. These were the days of “stop and frisk,” the days of “lock them up” and don’t worry about any fallout in the community.
Now, although we understand that there was a complicated system of racism involved and that minorities were being jailed at rates that were not proportional to the overall offender population, John Katko still shows no flexibility, no soul-searching, and offers no solution for that area of his constituency trapped in an opportunity desert. For a city that was once a stop on the Underground Railroad our continued segregation is a stain on our character. We the people, here in NY24, deserve a representative in Congress who is not just a Republican rubber stamp. Do not return this man to Congress.
Note: Since the New Year and since Trump ordered the killing of Qassem Suleimani, the House passed a new resolution to make it clear that the Congress is to be consulted about executive decisions that might cause a war and needs Congressional approval to declare war. Representatives in the House do not believe the President has shown the danger of “imminent attack.” Although the measure passed, John Katko voted no on this resolution also. John Katko supports and imperial view of the Presidency.
Scanned copy of Katko’s letter to me: