Chris Matthews, you have been disappointing me so much lately. I
thought you were more enlightened than other “semi-old white men”. I thought
you had experienced things in your life that gave you a more liberal
perspective and, despite the kernel of racism which remains in most of us white
folks, you had learned long ago to fight back whenever these remnants reared
their ugly heads. But perhaps you are finding it more difficult to ignore the
less than acceptable feelings that pertained when we were young.
older. I think you are harkening back more and more to the halcyon days when
you were so close to Tip O’Neill. The Vice President is getting into trouble
for using outdated lingo. You are guilty of unleashing your outdated feelings.
exercised over Obama’s approach to Syria and ISIS. Your perception that Obama
is weak and is harming America’s position in the world came across loud and
clear. I guess you can’t help judging Obama in 2014 by things that happened in
the 1980’s with that paragon Ronald Reagan and your pal Tip O’Neill. I guess
you felt that Obama should have jumped into the situation in Syria back when
that red line was crossed.
weak, but since we hardly triumphed in any war since World War II, since we
have spent billions and had many of our soldiers killed or maimed, do we really
want to have a President who takes us into war because his ego was damaged and
that might make America look weak. I am happy to have a President who is
reluctant to commit American lives to wars we clearly don’t fully understand.
feel that Obama should do something (although I am not sure what). How could
Obama have helped the situation in Texas? We do not have an epidemic of Ebola.
We have one case that came from abroad and several cases which may suggest that
our medical people are not adequately protected against this disease in its
most critical stages. You, Chris Matthews, went into a long tirade (which is
actually a repeat of past tirades) about Obama’s poor schmoozing skills.
have taken that would make these stubborn Congress people treat him with the
respect which should have been automatic. Their behavior has been abominable, a
terrible example to younger generations. These folks made a decision to shut
Obama out from the very beginning. Perhaps Obama could have been more
obsequious or more obstreperous or more congenial, but still he would never
belong to the old boy’s club which both your Reagan and your Tip O’Neill (and
in fact even you) belong to because you were born white and male.
which you do it sound like you are holding Obama responsible for the behavior
of the haters. It sounds like you are saying that it is Obama’s fault that they
are haters. Well that’s just crazy. I’m not sure that such criticisms by white
guys can offer us any insight into the experiences of our first African
American President. Then you go on to praise an article by Charles Krauthammer
and you recommend that we read it too. What would he know about this situation?
just before the midterm elections. Are you trying to tip the scales to the
right? Well you are getting on my last nerve and I plan to stop watching
Hardball. You have disappointed me too many times lately. Maybe FOX News will
people or continuing to let the NSA invade our already sadly depleted privacy.
Harangue him about these if you must, but the rest is not suited to your
audience. I have found your recent hawk-fest embarrassing and then your
analysis of Obama’s troubles with Congress smacks of racism or at the very
least of that sin which names the recipient of gauche behavior as the cause of
that behavior. When we blame women for the things men do to them we recognize
that that is wrong. But you are doing the same exact thing to Obama and it is
badly done, Chris Matthews.
This is the view from the cheap seats.
By Nancy Brisson